Journal decision profile

Annals of Botany

Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science

Annals of Botany's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.0, ranking Q1 in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Oxford University PressUnited KingdompISSN 0305-7364eISSN 1095-8290
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
3.0

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 3.84.

Review & acceptance time
i
Review & acceptance timeCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
98 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 76–128 days

96 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 96% coverage · 2024–2025

Annals of Botany accepts papers a median of 98 days after submission, including peer review and revisions. That is faster than 65% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$3,081

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Annals of Botany?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
3.02026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#56 / 3,957LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
37.9%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
2.18MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
98 daysIQR 76–128 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
185 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share37.9%

281 of 741 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share2.8%

21 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI2.18×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#56

of 3,957 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 2.18, so its typical recent paper runs about 118% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

37.9% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

2802016
2282017
2412018
2122019
2062020
1592021
1552022
2022023
2252024
3402025

Recent work-type mix

741 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article96.6%
Erratum2.8%
Editorial0.3%
Review0.3%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much Annals of Botany publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Plant and animal studies82
Plant Diversity and Evolution52
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics48
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies41
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism29
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations28
Genetic diversity and population structure24
Plant Molecular Biology Research23
Marine and coastal plant biology20
Fern and Epiphyte Biology17
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-08-12. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 741 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsQ1
Molecular BiologyQ2
Plant ScienceQ2

Is Annals of Botany a good journal?

Yes. A Q1 journal by citation data

Yes. By citation data, Annals of Botany is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and ranks #1,193 of 3,784 Biology & Basic Science journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 32%). Annals of Botany's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.0. Recent papers took a median of 98 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,081 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, and Plant Science, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Rank in Biology & Basic Science
#1,193 of 3,784
Top 32%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
3.0
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Submission to acceptance
98 days
Median, PubMed records
Indicative APC
$3,081
OpenAlex, verify with the journal
Papers published in 2025
340
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Its output more than doubled, from 155 papers in 2022 to 340 in 2025. Fast-growing journals can change in scope and editorial standards, so read recent papers in your topic.
  • Confirm the current article processing charge, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website; the OpenAlex figure is indicative.
  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B2
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#1,193
of 3,784 Biology & Basic Science field journals
#1,097
among Q1 Biology & Basic Science journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
16,108
H-Index
270
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
8,637
Subject Areas
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsMolecular BiologyPlant Science

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Annals of Botany

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Annals of Botany's papers in subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, and Plant Science. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Annals of Botany homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit online

    Use the submit link in Annals of Botany's author guidelines; Oxford University Press runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,081 USD. Check the current fee, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Recent accepted papers took a median of 98 days from submission to acceptance, including revisions (PubMed dates). Annals of Botany does not publish an acceptance rate.

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Annals of Botany

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Annals of Botany

Is Annals of Botany a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, Annals of Botany is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and ranks #1,193 of 3,784 Biology & Basic Science journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 32%). Annals of Botany's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.0. Recent papers took a median of 98 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,081 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, and Plant Science, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Annals of Botany's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Annals of Botany's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.0, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Annals of Botany?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Annals of Botany or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. What recent PubMed records do show is speed: accepted papers took a median of 98 days from submission to acceptance. To judge selectivity, compare Annals of Botany's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Annals of Botany in?

Annals of Botany's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Q2 in Molecular Biology; Q2 in Plant Science. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Annals of Botany will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does Annals of Botany take to accept a paper?

Annals of Botany accepts papers a median of 98 days after submission across 96 recent PubMed records with both dates; the middle half took 76–128 days. This includes peer review, editorial handling, and revisions.

How long is the peer review time at Annals of Botany?

PubMed records when a manuscript was received and accepted, not the individual review stages, so peer review time on its own is not available. The full time from submission to acceptance at Annals of Botany, which includes peer review and revisions, has a median of 98 days. For the time to a first decision, check the journal's own website.

Is Annals of Botany faster than similar journals?

Annals of Botany's median of 98 days from submission to acceptance is faster than 65% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

How much does it cost to publish in Annals of Botany?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,081 USD for Annals of Botany. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to Annals of Botany?

Comparable journals include Aob Plants, American Journal of Botany, Plant Diversity, and Alpine Botany. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Annals of Botany?

Submit online through the link in Annals of Botany's author guidelines on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter. Accepted papers took a median of 98 days from submission to acceptance in recent PubMed records.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search