Journal decision profile

PLOS Genetics

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

PLOS Genetics' 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.2, ranking Q2 in Molecular Biology. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Public Library of ScienceUnited StatespISSN 1553-7404eISSN 1553-7404
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
4.2

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 5.36.

Review & acceptance time
i
Review & acceptance timeCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
163 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 114–214 days

99 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 99% coverage · 2024–2025

PLOS Genetics accepts papers a median of 163 days after submission, including peer review and revisions. That is slower than 84% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$2,655

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit PLOS Genetics?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
4.22026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#37 / 720LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
30.2%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
1.56MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
163 daysIQR 114–214 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
454 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share30.2%

548 of 1,816 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share2.3%

41 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI1.56×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#37

of 720 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 1.56, so its typical recent paper runs about 56% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

30.2% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

7692016
6162017
6152018
5692019
5672020
5842021
4892022
4232023
3202024
4062025

Recent work-type mix

1,816 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article96.7%
Erratum2.6%
Retraction0.4%
Review0.1%
Book review0.1%
Editorial0.1%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much PLOS Genetics publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology96
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms94
DNA Repair Mechanisms73
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations59
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research50
RNA Research and Splicing50
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics48
Plant Molecular Biology Research40
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics35
Fungal and yeast genetics research34
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-08-12. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 1,816 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Molecular BiologyQ2
AgingQ3
Q2
Subfield Quartile
B2
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#725
of 3,784 Biology & Basic Science field journals
#13
among Q2 Biology & Basic Science journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

PLOS journals compared

2026 Journal Metrics Scores for all 12 PLOS journals published by Public Library of Science, highest score first. Each journal is scored separately; there is no combined score for the PLOS family.

  1. PLOS Medicine8.0Q1
  2. PLOS Biology6.8Q1
  3. PLOS Digital Health5.9Q1
  4. PLOS Pathogens5.1Q1
  5. PLOS Geneticsthis journal4.2Q2
  6. PLOS Computational Biology4.1Q1
  7. PLOS Climate3.7Q1
  8. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases3.7Q1
  9. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation3.3Q1
  10. PLOS Global Public Health3.0Q1
  11. PLOS One3.0Q1
  12. PLOS Water2.6Q1

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
11,790
H-Index
346
Fully Open Access
Yes
Recent OA Works
11,766
Subject Areas
Molecular BiologyAging

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

Common questions about PLOS Genetics

What is PLOS Genetics' Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

PLOS Genetics' 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.2, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What quartile is PLOS Genetics in?

PLOS Genetics' best quartile is Q2. By OpenAlex subfield: Q2 in Molecular Biology; Q3 in Aging. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for PLOS Genetics will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does PLOS Genetics take to accept a paper?

PLOS Genetics accepts papers a median of 163 days after submission across 99 recent PubMed records with both dates; the middle half took 114–214 days. This includes peer review, editorial handling, and revisions.

How long is the peer review time at PLOS Genetics?

PubMed records when a manuscript was received and accepted, not the individual review stages, so peer review time on its own is not available. The full time from submission to acceptance at PLOS Genetics, which includes peer review and revisions, has a median of 163 days. For the time to a first decision, check the journal's own website.

Is PLOS Genetics faster than similar journals?

PLOS Genetics' median of 163 days from submission to acceptance is slower than 84% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

How much does it cost to publish in PLOS Genetics?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,655 USD for PLOS Genetics. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to PLOS Genetics?

Comparable journals include Genetics, Nature Reviews Genetics, Bmc Biology, and Bioessays. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

Back to Search