Journal decision profile

Radiocarbon

Earth and Planetary Sciences

Radiocarbon's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.4, ranking Q1 in Anthropology. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Cambridge University PressUnited StatespISSN 0033-8222eISSN 1945-5755
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
1.4

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 1.31.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED

Not available — there are not enough recent PubMed records with both received and accepted dates.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$2,487

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Radiocarbon?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
1.42026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#82 / 2,562LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
9.8%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
0.65MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
—NOT AVAILABLE
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
121 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share9.8%

47 of 482 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share1%

5 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI0.65×

Below field-year expectation

Source output rank#82

of 2,562 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.65, so its typical recent paper runs about 35% below its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

9.8% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

1312016
1582017
1482018
1582019
1432020
1182021
1082022
1312023
1252024
1092025

Recent work-type mix

482 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article96.5%
Erratum1.5%
Other1.5%
Editorial0.4%
Book review0.2%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and research coverage

OpenAlex topics show the research communities this journal serves.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies296
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research23
Tree-ring climate responses16
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies11
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics8
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology7
Radioactive contamination and transfer6
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols4
Biographical and Historical Analysis4
Marine and coastal ecosystems4
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-16. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 482 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
PaleontologyQ2
Atmospheric ScienceQ3
EcologyQ3
AnthropologyQ1

Is Radiocarbon a good journal?

Yes. A Q1 journal by citation data

Yes. By citation data, Radiocarbon is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Anthropology and ranks #1,632 of 2,727 Environmental Science journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 60%). Radiocarbon's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.4. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,487 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
Anthropology
Rank in Environmental Science
#1,632 of 2,727
Top 60%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
1.4
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Indicative APC
$2,487
OpenAlex, verify with the journal
Papers published in 2025
109
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the current article processing charge, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website; the OpenAlex figure is indicative.
  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B3
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#1,632
of 2,727 Environmental Science field journals
#992
among Q1 Environmental Science journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
5,892
H-Index
141
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
4,633
Subject Areas
PaleontologyAtmospheric ScienceEcologyAnthropology

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Radiocarbon

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Radiocarbon's papers in subfields including Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Radiocarbon homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit online

    Use the submit link in Radiocarbon's author guidelines; Cambridge University Press runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,487 USD. Check the current fee, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Radiocarbon does not publish an acceptance rate.

Common questions about Radiocarbon

Is Radiocarbon a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, Radiocarbon is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Anthropology and ranks #1,632 of 2,727 Environmental Science journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 60%). Radiocarbon's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.4. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,487 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Radiocarbon's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Radiocarbon's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.4, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Radiocarbon?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Radiocarbon or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. To judge selectivity, compare Radiocarbon's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Radiocarbon in?

Radiocarbon's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q2 in Paleontology; Q3 in Atmospheric Science; Q3 in Ecology; Q1 in Anthropology. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Radiocarbon will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How much does it cost to publish in Radiocarbon?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,487 USD for Radiocarbon. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to Radiocarbon?

Comparable journals include Environmental Archaeology, Archaeofauna, Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology, and Quaternary Geochronology. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Radiocarbon?

Submit online through the link in Radiocarbon's author guidelines on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search