Journal decision profile

Science

Multidisciplinary

Science's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 20.0, ranking Q1 in Molecular Biology and 3 other subfields. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

American Association for the Advancement of ScienceUnited StatespISSN 0036-8075eISSN 1095-9203
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
20.0

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 20.15.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED

Not available — there are not enough recent PubMed records with both received and accepted dates.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
Not available

No journal-level APC is available in the current OpenAlex snapshot. Cost is excluded from scoring.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Science?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
20.02026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#55 / 22,069LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
37.2%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
0.89MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
—NOT AVAILABLE
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
2424 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share37.2%

3604 of 9,697 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share19.6%

1899 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI0.89×

Below field-year expectation

Source output rank#55

of 22,069 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.89, so its typical recent paper runs about 11% below its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

37.2% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

50132016
50162017
47932018
47202019
46602020
35102021
20552022
20862023
20462024
20572025

Recent work-type mix

9,697 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article91.1%
Editorial4.4%
Book review1.9%
Book chapter1.1%
Other0.7%
Erratum0.6%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much Science publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Science, Research, and Medicine279
Biotechnology and Related Fields234
Academic Publishing and Open Access200
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research184
Academic Writing and Publishing183
Health and Medical Research Impacts116
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering88
Perovskite Materials and Applications82
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures59
Gut microbiota and health55
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-08-12. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 9,697 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Molecular BiologyQ1
Infectious DiseasesQ1
Global and Planetary ChangeQ1
Astronomy and AstrophysicsQ1
Q1
Subfield Quartile
B1
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#22
of 6,272 Medicine field journals
#22
among Q1 Medicine journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Science journals compared

2026 Journal Metrics Scores for all 6 Science journals published by American Association for the Advancement of Science, highest score first. Each journal is scored separately; there is no combined score for the Science family.

  1. Sciencethis journal20.0Q1
  2. Science Robotics16.8Q1
  3. Science Immunology15.2Q1
  4. Science Translational Medicine14.8Q1
  5. Science Advances12.3Q1
  6. Science Signaling5.5Q1

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
393,785
H-Index
1,758
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
33,357
Subject Areas
Infectious DiseasesMolecular BiologySafety ResearchGlobal and Planetary Change

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

An editorial perspective on Science

By Dr. Meng Zhao, Physician-Scientist · Founder, LabCat AI · Editorial policy

Science has been published weekly since 1880, today by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Although Science and Nature are usually spoken of in the same breath, in practice they behave differently as venues. A few observations from the receiving end of many submission decisions:

Science has a slightly higher tolerance for method papers.

A well-motivated new technique with convincing applications has historically had a reasonable home at Science. Nature tends to require the method and a landmark biological finding in the same paper.

The Research Article vs. Report distinction matters.

Science publishes both Research Articles (longer, discursive) and Reports (short, single-claim). Picking the right format up front reduces one category of editorial friction — an important claim with a single experimental arc is almost always a Report.

Policy and health topics often land better at Science than Nature.

Science's affiliation with AAAS gives it a stronger public-policy orientation. Papers where the novel finding has immediate public-health or policy implications sometimes get more traction here than at Nature's more basic-science tilt.

The AAAS family is smaller, so specialty fallbacks are limited.

Nature has dozens of specialty titles to cascade to; the Science family is much smaller (Science Advances, Science Translational Medicine, Science Immunology, Science Signaling, Science Robotics). Plan your backup journal list accordingly — many Science rejections end up at non-AAAS specialty venues.

What Science editors look for

Before submitting, check the manuscript against what the editors screen for first:

  • A significant advance in scientific knowledge, not an incremental extension.
  • Interest that reaches readers across more than one discipline.
  • Rigorous methodology and results that others can reproduce.
  • Writing that a general scientific audience can follow.
  • Ethics compliance and data that are available to readers and reviewers.

If the advance mainly matters within one field, a specialty journal is usually the better first submission.

Common questions about Science

What is Science's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Science's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 20.0, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What quartile is Science in?

Science's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Molecular Biology; Q1 in Infectious Diseases; Q1 in Global and Planetary Change; Q1 in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Science will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

Which journals are alternatives to Science?

Comparable journals include Nature, Cell, Nature Communications, and Nature Microbiology. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

Back to Search