Cell Reports vs Nature Communications

2026 data, updated August 2026

Nature Communications is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 16.7 against 8.0 for Cell Reports, about 2.1 times higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Cell Reports is faster from submission to acceptance: a median of 186 days against 248 days in recent PubMed records. Nature Communications is the larger journal, with 12,640 papers in 2025 against 1,577 for Cell Reports.

Side-by-side numbers

MeasureCell ReportsNature Communications
2026 Journal Metrics Score8.016.7
Best subfield quartileQ1Q1
Rank in field#44 of 1,172 in Neuroscience#37 of 3,784 in Biology & Basic Science
Acceptance rate (publisher-reported)Not publishedNot published
Median days, submission to acceptance186 days248 days
Access modelFully open accessFully open access
Indicative APC (OpenAlex)$5,460$6,290
Papers published in 20251,57712,640
h-index (OpenAlex)326747
PublisherCell PressNature Portfolio

Bold marks the stronger figure where one direction is better. Journal Metrics Score is a two-year citation average; quartiles and field ranks are computed within OpenAlex subfields and site fields. Data source: OpenAlex (CC0). Submission-to-acceptance days come from PubMed received and accepted dates and include revisions. Acceptance rates appear only where the publisher publishes one. APCs are indicative OpenAlex values.

Which should you choose?

Choose Cell Reports if

  • a faster path from submission to acceptance matters
  • a lower open-access fee matters

Choose Nature Communications if

  • you want the venue whose recent papers are cited more

Fit with each journal's scope matters more than any single number. Read a few recent papers in your topic in both journals before deciding.

Common questions about Cell Reports vs Nature Communications

Is Cell Reports better than Nature Communications?

Nature Communications is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 16.7 against 8.0 for Cell Reports, about 2.1 times higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Which is better for your paper depends on its scope and how broad the result is; citation data measures the journals, not individual papers.

Which is faster, Cell Reports or Nature Communications?

Cell Reports is faster: a median of 186 days from submission to acceptance against 248 days, in recent PubMed records. The interval includes revisions, so it is not the time to a first decision.

Is it easier to get into Cell Reports or Nature Communications?

Cell Reports does not publish an acceptance rate. Nature Communications does not publish an acceptance rate. Without published rates for both, compare their field rank and scope instead.

Are Cell Reports and Nature Communications open access?

Cell Reports is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $5,460. Nature Communications is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $6,290. Confirm current fees on each journal's website.