Nature Communications vs Scientific Reports

2026 data, updated August 2026

Nature Communications is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 16.7 against 4.8 for Scientific Reports, about 3.5 times higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Scientific Reports is faster from submission to acceptance: a median of 126 days against 248 days in recent PubMed records. Scientific Reports is the larger journal, with 48,695 papers in 2025 against 12,640 for Nature Communications.

Side-by-side numbers

MeasureNature CommunicationsScientific Reports
2026 Journal Metrics Score16.74.8
Best subfield quartileQ1Q1
Rank in field#37 of 3,784 in Biology & Basic Science#565 of 3,784 in Biology & Basic Science
Acceptance rate (publisher-reported)Not publishedNot published
Median days, submission to acceptance248 days126 days
Access modelFully open accessFully open access
Indicative APC (OpenAlex)$6,290$2,390
Papers published in 202512,64048,695
h-index (OpenAlex)747462
PublisherNature PortfolioNature Portfolio

Bold marks the stronger figure where one direction is better. Journal Metrics Score is a two-year citation average; quartiles and field ranks are computed within OpenAlex subfields and site fields. Data source: OpenAlex (CC0). Submission-to-acceptance days come from PubMed received and accepted dates and include revisions. Acceptance rates appear only where the publisher publishes one. APCs are indicative OpenAlex values.

Which should you choose?

Choose Nature Communications if

  • you want the venue whose recent papers are cited more

Choose Scientific Reports if

  • a faster path from submission to acceptance matters
  • a lower open-access fee matters

Fit with each journal's scope matters more than any single number. Read a few recent papers in your topic in both journals before deciding.

Common questions about Nature Communications vs Scientific Reports

Is Nature Communications better than Scientific Reports?

Nature Communications is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 16.7 against 4.8 for Scientific Reports, about 3.5 times higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Which is better for your paper depends on its scope and how broad the result is; citation data measures the journals, not individual papers.

Which is faster, Nature Communications or Scientific Reports?

Scientific Reports is faster: a median of 126 days from submission to acceptance against 248 days, in recent PubMed records. The interval includes revisions, so it is not the time to a first decision.

Is it easier to get into Nature Communications or Scientific Reports?

Nature Communications does not publish an acceptance rate. Scientific Reports does not publish an acceptance rate. Without published rates for both, compare their field rank and scope instead.

Are Nature Communications and Scientific Reports open access?

Nature Communications is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $6,290. Scientific Reports is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $2,390. Confirm current fees on each journal's website.