PLOS ONE vs Scientific Reports

2026 data, updated August 2026

Scientific Reports is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.8 against 3.0 for PLOS ONE, about 60% higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Scientific Reports is faster from submission to acceptance: a median of 126 days against 166 days in recent PubMed records. PLOS reports a 26% acceptance rate for PLOS ONE; Scientific Reports does not publish one. Scientific Reports is the larger journal, with 48,695 papers in 2025 against 19,598 for PLOS ONE.

Side-by-side numbers

MeasurePLOS ONEScientific Reports
2026 Journal Metrics Score3.04.8
Best subfield quartileQ1Q1
Rank in field#1,436 of 6,272 in Medicine#565 of 3,784 in Biology & Basic Science
Acceptance rate (publisher-reported)26%Not published
Median days, submission to acceptance166 days126 days
Access modelFully open accessFully open access
Indicative APC (OpenAlex)$1,805$2,390
Papers published in 202519,59848,695
h-index (OpenAlex)601462
PublisherPublic Library of ScienceNature Portfolio

Bold marks the stronger figure where one direction is better. Journal Metrics Score is a two-year citation average; quartiles and field ranks are computed within OpenAlex subfields and site fields. Data source: OpenAlex (CC0). Submission-to-acceptance days come from PubMed received and accepted dates and include revisions. Acceptance rates appear only where the publisher publishes one. APCs are indicative OpenAlex values.

Which should you choose?

Choose PLOS ONE if

  • a lower open-access fee matters

Choose Scientific Reports if

  • you want the venue whose recent papers are cited more
  • a faster path from submission to acceptance matters

Fit with each journal's scope matters more than any single number. Read a few recent papers in your topic in both journals before deciding.

Common questions about PLOS ONE vs Scientific Reports

Is PLOS ONE better than Scientific Reports?

Scientific Reports is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.8 against 3.0 for PLOS ONE, about 60% higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Which is better for your paper depends on its scope and how broad the result is; citation data measures the journals, not individual papers.

Which is faster, PLOS ONE or Scientific Reports?

Scientific Reports is faster: a median of 126 days from submission to acceptance against 166 days, in recent PubMed records. The interval includes revisions, so it is not the time to a first decision.

Is it easier to get into PLOS ONE or Scientific Reports?

PLOS reports 26% for PLOS ONE (2025). Scientific Reports does not publish an acceptance rate. Without published rates for both, compare their field rank and scope instead.

Are PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports open access?

PLOS ONE is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $1,805. Scientific Reports is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $2,390. Confirm current fees on each journal's website.