Communications Biology vs Scientific Reports

2026 data, updated August 2026

Communications Biology is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 6.0 against 4.8 for Scientific Reports, about 25% higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Scientific Reports is faster from submission to acceptance: a median of 126 days against 228 days in recent PubMed records. Scientific Reports is the larger journal, with 48,695 papers in 2025 against 1,994 for Communications Biology.

Side-by-side numbers

MeasureCommunications BiologyScientific Reports
2026 Journal Metrics Score6.04.8
Best subfield quartileQ1Q1
Rank in field#74 of 1,172 in Neuroscience#565 of 3,784 in Biology & Basic Science
Acceptance rate (publisher-reported)Not publishedNot published
Median days, submission to acceptance228 days126 days
Access modelFully open accessFully open access
Indicative APC (OpenAlex)$3,690$2,390
Papers published in 20251,99448,695
h-index (OpenAlex)145462
PublisherNature PortfolioNature Portfolio

Bold marks the stronger figure where one direction is better. Journal Metrics Score is a two-year citation average; quartiles and field ranks are computed within OpenAlex subfields and site fields. Data source: OpenAlex (CC0). Submission-to-acceptance days come from PubMed received and accepted dates and include revisions. Acceptance rates appear only where the publisher publishes one. APCs are indicative OpenAlex values.

Which should you choose?

Choose Communications Biology if

  • you want the venue whose recent papers are cited more

Choose Scientific Reports if

  • a faster path from submission to acceptance matters
  • a lower open-access fee matters

Fit with each journal's scope matters more than any single number. Read a few recent papers in your topic in both journals before deciding.

Common questions about Communications Biology vs Scientific Reports

Is Communications Biology better than Scientific Reports?

Communications Biology is the more cited journal: its 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 6.0 against 4.8 for Scientific Reports, about 25% higher. Both are Q1 journals in their best subfield. Which is better for your paper depends on its scope and how broad the result is; citation data measures the journals, not individual papers.

Which is faster, Communications Biology or Scientific Reports?

Scientific Reports is faster: a median of 126 days from submission to acceptance against 228 days, in recent PubMed records. The interval includes revisions, so it is not the time to a first decision.

Is it easier to get into Communications Biology or Scientific Reports?

Communications Biology does not publish an acceptance rate. Scientific Reports does not publish an acceptance rate. Without published rates for both, compare their field rank and scope instead.

Are Communications Biology and Scientific Reports open access?

Communications Biology is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $3,690. Scientific Reports is fully open access, with an indicative APC of $2,390. Confirm current fees on each journal's website.