Journal decision profile

Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing

Engineering

Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.2, ranking Q3 in Mechanical Engineering and 1 other subfield. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

United StatespISSN 1555-256XeISSN 1555-2578
Checking system sharing availability.

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
1.2

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 0.92.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED

Not available — there are not enough recent PubMed records with both received and accepted dates.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
Not available

No journal-level APC is available in the current OpenAlex snapshot. Cost is excluded from scoring.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
1.22026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#177 / 797LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
0.7%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
0.22MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
—NOT AVAILABLE
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
153 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share0.7%

4 of 610 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share0%

0 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI0.22×

Below field-year expectation

Source output rank#177

of 797 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.22, so its typical recent paper runs about 78% below its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

0.7% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

12016
22017
62018
402019
862020
1162021
2002022
1572023
1372024
1282025

Recent work-type mix

610 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article99.3%
Review0.3%
Dissertation0.2%
Retraction0.2%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and research coverage

OpenAlex topics show the research communities this journal serves.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Drilling and Well Engineering40
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer27
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis25
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps21
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer21
Concrete and Cement Materials Research17
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods16
Heat Transfer and Optimization15
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques14
Wind Energy Research and Development13
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-20. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 610 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Mechanical EngineeringQ3
Ocean EngineeringQ3
Biomedical EngineeringQ4

Is Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing a good journal?

A mid-ranked Q3 journal by citation data

By citation data, Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing is a mid-ranked journal: it is Q3 in Mechanical Engineering and 1 other subfield, the third quarter of journals by score, below the subfield median, and ranks #2,660 of 3,811 Engineering journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 70%). Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.2. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q3
Mechanical Engineering
Rank in Engineering
#2,660 of 3,811
Top 70%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
1.2
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Access model
Fully open access
No APC on record in OpenAlex
Papers published in 2025
128
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q3
Subfield Quartile
N/A
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#2,660
of 3,811 Engineering field journals
#434
among Q3 Engineering journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
946
H-Index
16
Fully Open Access
Yes
Recent OA Works
941
Subject Areas
Mechanical EngineeringOcean EngineeringBiomedical Engineering

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's papers in subfields including Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

  3. 3

    Submit online

    Use the submit link in Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's author guidelines. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    The journal is fully open access, and OpenAlex has no article processing charge on record. Check the journal website for current fees and waivers.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing does not publish an acceptance rate.

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing

Is Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing a good journal?

By citation data, Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing is a mid-ranked journal: it is Q3 in Mechanical Engineering and 1 other subfield, the third quarter of journals by score, below the subfield median, and ranks #2,660 of 3,811 Engineering journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 70%). Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.2. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 1.2, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. To judge selectivity, compare Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing in?

Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's best quartile is Q3. By OpenAlex subfield: Q3 in Mechanical Engineering; Q3 in Ocean Engineering; Q4 in Biomedical Engineering. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

Which journals are alternatives to Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing?

Comparable journals include Journal of Energy Resources Technology-Transactions of the Asme, Geoenergy Science and Engineering, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, and Petroleum Science. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing?

Submit online through the link in Fdmp-Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing's author guidelines. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search