Journal decision profile

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology

Medicine

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.2, ranking Q1 in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Elsevier BVUnited StatespISSN 2405-500XeISSN 2405-5018
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
3.2

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 3.75.

Review & acceptance time
i
Review & acceptance timeCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
102 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 63–131 days

99 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 99% coverage · 2024–2025

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology accepts papers a median of 102 days after submission, including peer review and revisions. That is faster than 57% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$4,500

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
3.22026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#128 / 1,144LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
24.1%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
0.92MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
102 daysIQR 63–131 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
338 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share24.1%

326 of 1,353 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share2.7%

37 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI0.92×

Below field-year expectation

Source output rank#128

of 1,144 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.92, so its typical recent paper runs about 8% below its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

24.1% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

1782016
3972017
2482018
2422019
3062020
2512021
2732022
4232023
4062024
4612025

Recent work-type mix

1,353 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article85.2%
Editorial9.9%
Paratext2.4%
Letter1.9%
Erratum0.4%
Book review0.1%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments322
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes292
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies169
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias147
Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders29
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies28
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise25
Congenital Heart Disease Studies17
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments16
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies16
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-08-12. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 1,353 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineQ1
Q1
Subfield Quartile
B1
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#1,269
of 6,272 Medicine field journals
#1,255
among Q1 Medicine journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

JACC journals compared

2026 Journal Metrics Scores for all 9 JACC journals published by Elsevier BV, highest score first. Each journal is scored separately; there is no combined score for the JACC family.

  1. Jacc: Cardiooncology6.5Q1
  2. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging5.3Q1
  3. JACC-Heart Failure4.1Q1
  4. JACC-Advances3.2Q1
  5. JACC-Clinical Electrophysiologythis journal3.2Q1
  6. JACC-Basic to Translational Science3.0Q1
  7. JACC-Cardiovascular Interventions2.6Q1
  8. JACC-Asia2.0Q2
  9. JACC-Journal of the American College of Cardiology1.2Q3

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
3,679
H-Index
98
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
1,877
Subject Areas
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

Common questions about JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology

What is JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.2, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What quartile is JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology in?

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology take to accept a paper?

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology accepts papers a median of 102 days after submission across 99 recent PubMed records with both dates; the middle half took 63–131 days. This includes peer review, editorial handling, and revisions.

How long is the peer review time at JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology?

PubMed records when a manuscript was received and accepted, not the individual review stages, so peer review time on its own is not available. The full time from submission to acceptance at JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology, which includes peer review and revisions, has a median of 102 days. For the time to a first decision, check the journal's own website.

Is JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology faster than similar journals?

JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology's median of 102 days from submission to acceptance is faster than 57% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

How much does it cost to publish in JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $4,500 USD for JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology?

Comparable journals include Circulation-Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Europace, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, and Journal of Arrhythmia. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

Back to Search