Journal decision profile

JACC-Heart Failure

Medicine

JACC-Heart Failure's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.1, ranking Q1 in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Elsevier BVNetherlandspISSN 2213-1779eISSN 2213-1787
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
4.1

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 4.84.

Review & acceptance time
i
Review & acceptance timeCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
112 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 71–152 days

100 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 100% coverage · 2024–2025

JACC-Heart Failure accepts papers a median of 112 days after submission, including peer review and revisions. That is slower than 54% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$5,000

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit JACC-Heart Failure?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
4.12026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#185 / 1,974LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
30.4%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
1.05MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
112 daysIQR 71–152 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
252 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share30.4%

306 of 1,007 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share4.4%

44 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI1.05×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#185

of 1,974 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 1.05, so its typical recent paper runs about 5% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

30.4% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

1682016
1872017
2172018
2042019
1932020
1732021
1672022
3582023
3092024
4332025

Recent work-type mix

1,007 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article90%
Letter4.9%
Paratext2.6%
Erratum1.8%
Editorial0.6%
Review0.2%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much JACC-Heart Failure publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Heart Failure Treatment and Management422
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices62
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes44
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies36
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes22
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies22
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments19
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes17
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology17
Diabetes Treatment and Management15
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-19. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 1,007 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineQ1
Biomedical EngineeringQ2

Is JACC-Heart Failure a good journal?

Yes. A Q1 journal by citation data

Yes. By citation data, JACC-Heart Failure is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and ranks #58 of 507 Cardiology journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 12%). JACC-Heart Failure's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.1. Recent papers took a median of 112 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $5,000 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Rank in Cardiology
#58 of 507
Top 12%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
4.1
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Submission to acceptance
112 days
Median, PubMed records
Indicative APC
$5,000
OpenAlex, verify with the journal
Papers published in 2025
431
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Its output more than doubled, from 167 papers in 2022 to 431 in 2025. Fast-growing journals can change in scope and editorial standards, so read recent papers in your topic.
  • Confirm the current article processing charge, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website; the OpenAlex figure is indicative.
  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B1
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#58
of 507 Cardiology field journals
#58
among Q1 Cardiology journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

JACC journals compared

2026 Journal Metrics Scores for all 9 JACC journals published by Elsevier BV, highest score first. Each journal is scored separately; there is no combined score for the JACC family.

  1. Jacc: Cardiooncology6.5Q1
  2. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging5.3Q1
  3. JACC-Heart Failurethis journal4.1Q1
  4. JACC-Advances3.2Q1
  5. JACC-Clinical Electrophysiology3.2Q1
  6. JACC-Basic to Translational Science3.0Q1
  7. JACC-Cardiovascular Interventions2.6Q1
  8. JACC-Asia2.0Q2
  9. JACC-Journal of the American College of Cardiology1.2Q3

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
3,050
H-Index
142
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
1,775
Subject Areas
Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineBiomedical Engineering

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to JACC-Heart Failure

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies JACC-Heart Failure's papers in subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    JACC-Heart Failure homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit through Editorial Manager

    Most Elsevier and Cell Press journals take submissions through Editorial Manager; each journal has its own site, reached from Submit your article on the journal homepage.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $5,000 USD. Check the current fee, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Recent accepted papers took a median of 112 days from submission to acceptance, including revisions (PubMed dates). JACC-Heart Failure does not publish an acceptance rate.

Submission system from the publisher's author information, checked 2026-10-27. Individual journals can differ, so follow the link in the journal's own author guidelines.

New on PubMed

What's new in your field?

Type a topic to see the newest PubMed papers from the past week and the big picture of what they found, summarized by Claude on the Pro plan. Get a free weekly email to keep up.

See a demo:GLP-1CRISPRLong COVID

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to JACC-Heart Failure

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about JACC-Heart Failure

Is JACC-Heart Failure a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, JACC-Heart Failure is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and ranks #58 of 507 Cardiology journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 12%). JACC-Heart Failure's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.1. Recent papers took a median of 112 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $5,000 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is JACC-Heart Failure's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

JACC-Heart Failure's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.1, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of JACC-Heart Failure?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by JACC-Heart Failure or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. What recent PubMed records do show is speed: accepted papers took a median of 112 days from submission to acceptance. To judge selectivity, compare JACC-Heart Failure's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is JACC-Heart Failure in?

JACC-Heart Failure's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Q2 in Biomedical Engineering. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for JACC-Heart Failure will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does JACC-Heart Failure take to accept a paper?

JACC-Heart Failure accepts papers a median of 112 days after submission across 100 recent PubMed records with both dates; the middle half took 71–152 days. This includes peer review, editorial handling, and revisions.

How long is the peer review time at JACC-Heart Failure?

PubMed records when a manuscript was received and accepted, not the individual review stages, so peer review time on its own is not available. The full time from submission to acceptance at JACC-Heart Failure, which includes peer review and revisions, has a median of 112 days. For the time to a first decision, check the journal's own website.

Is JACC-Heart Failure faster than similar journals?

JACC-Heart Failure's median of 112 days from submission to acceptance is slower than 54% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

How much does it cost to publish in JACC-Heart Failure?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $5,000 USD for JACC-Heart Failure. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to JACC-Heart Failure?

Comparable journals include Esc Heart Failure, Cardiac Failure Review, Current Heart Failure Reports, and Heart Failure Reviews. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to JACC-Heart Failure?

Most Elsevier and Cell Press journals take submissions through Editorial Manager; each journal has its own site, reached from Submit your article on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter. Accepted papers took a median of 112 days from submission to acceptance in recent PubMed records.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search