Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.5, ranking Q4 in Research and Theory and 3 other subfields. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.
Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.
Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 0.72.
Not available — there are not enough recent PubMed records with both received and accepted dates.
No journal-level APC is available in the current OpenAlex snapshot. Cost is excluded from scoring.
Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.
Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.
Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.
14 of 413 works · same type, year & subfield
0 works · same type, year & subfield
Below field-year expectation
of 4,238 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output
FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.30, so its typical recent paper runs about 70% below its field benchmark.
3.4% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.
Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.
OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025
413 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024
OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.
Select a MeSH signal to see how much Journal for Nurses in Professional Development publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.
Candidates share at least one OpenAlex subfield (or field, if too few do) with this journal's main research topics, ignoring generic catch-all topics, and are ordered by topic overlap, then current Journal Metrics Score.
* Cost is indicative only. APCs, taxes, waivers, and member discounts can change—always verify on the journal's official website.
| Category | Quartile |
|---|---|
| Research and Theory | Q4 |
| General Health Professions | Q4 |
| Issues, ethics and legal aspects | Q4 |
| Physiology | Q4 |
A lower-cited Q4 journal by citation data
By citation data, Journal for Nurses in Professional Development is in the lowest quartile in Research and Theory and 3 other subfields and ranks #305 of 352 Nursing journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 87%). A Q4 placement means its papers are cited less than most in the subfield; on its own it does not mean the journal is predatory or that its peer review is weak. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.5. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Research and Theory, General Health Professions, and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, so check that your topic fits its scope.
Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.
Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.
Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.
OpenAlex classifies Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's papers in subfields including Research and Theory, General Health Professions, and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.
Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development homepage ↗Use the submit link in Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's author guidelines; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.
OpenAlex has no article processing charge on record. Check the journal website for page charges or an optional open-access fee.
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development does not publish an acceptance rate.
By citation data, Journal for Nurses in Professional Development is in the lowest quartile in Research and Theory and 3 other subfields and ranks #305 of 352 Nursing journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 87%). A Q4 placement means its papers are cited less than most in the subfield; on its own it does not mean the journal is predatory or that its peer review is weak. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.5. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Research and Theory, General Health Professions, and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, so check that your topic fits its scope.
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.5, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.
We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Journal for Nurses in Professional Development or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. To judge selectivity, compare Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's best quartile is Q4. By OpenAlex subfield: Q4 in Research and Theory; Q4 in General Health Professions; Q4 in Issues, ethics and legal aspects; Q4 in Physiology. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.
No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Journal for Nurses in Professional Development will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.
Comparable journals include Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Journal of Professional Nursing, Journal of Nursing Administration, and Nurse Education Today. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.
Submit online through the link in Journal for Nurses in Professional Development's author guidelines on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter.