Journal decision profile

Assessing Writing

Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences

Assessing Writing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.0, ranking Q1 in Education and 2 other subfields. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Elsevier BVUnited StatespISSN 1075-2935eISSN 1873-5916
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
4.0

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 6.67.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED

Not available — there are not enough recent PubMed records with both received and accepted dates.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$3,330

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Assessing Writing?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
4.02026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#1722 / 17,771LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
68.5%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
9.90MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
—NOT AVAILABLE
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
68 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share68.5%

187 of 273 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share27.8%

76 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI9.90×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#1722

of 17,771 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 9.90, so its typical recent paper runs about 890% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

68.5% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

352016
342017
382018
352019
392020
622021
542022
872023
702024
712025

Recent work-type mix

273 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article78%
Book review8.4%
Editorial5.9%
Paratext5.9%
Review1.5%
Erratum0.4%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and research coverage

OpenAlex topics show the research communities this journal serves.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning96
Student Assessment and Feedback51
Second Language Acquisition and Learning29
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies14
Writing and Handwriting Education14
Educational and Psychological Assessments4
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing4
Academic integrity and plagiarism2
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches1
Artificial Intelligence in Education1
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-16. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 273 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
EducationQ1
Language and LinguisticsQ1
Literature and Literary TheoryQ1

Is Assessing Writing a good journal?

Yes. A Q1 journal by citation data

Yes. By citation data, Assessing Writing is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Education and 2 other subfields and ranks #436 of 6,918 Social Sciences journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 7%). Assessing Writing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.0. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,330 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Education, Language and Linguistics, and Literature and Literary Theory, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
Education
Rank in Social Sciences
#436 of 6,918
Top 7%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
4.0
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Indicative APC
$3,330
OpenAlex, verify with the journal
Papers published in 2025
71
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the current article processing charge, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website; the OpenAlex figure is indicative.
  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B1
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#436
of 6,918 Social Sciences field journals
#436
among Q1 Social Sciences journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
1,074
H-Index
75
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
139
Subject Areas
EducationLanguage and LinguisticsLiterature and Literary Theory

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Assessing Writing

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Assessing Writing's papers in subfields including Education, Language and Linguistics, and Literature and Literary Theory. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Assessing Writing homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit through Editorial Manager

    Most Elsevier and Cell Press journals take submissions through Editorial Manager; each journal has its own site, reached from Submit your article on the journal homepage.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,330 USD. Check the current fee, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Assessing Writing does not publish an acceptance rate.

Submission system from the publisher's author information, checked 2026-10-27. Individual journals can differ, so follow the link in the journal's own author guidelines.

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Assessing Writing

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Assessing Writing

Is Assessing Writing a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, Assessing Writing is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Education and 2 other subfields and ranks #436 of 6,918 Social Sciences journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 7%). Assessing Writing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.0. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,330 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Education, Language and Linguistics, and Literature and Literary Theory, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Assessing Writing's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Assessing Writing's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 4.0, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Assessing Writing?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Assessing Writing or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. To judge selectivity, compare Assessing Writing's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Assessing Writing in?

Assessing Writing's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Education; Q1 in Language and Linguistics; Q1 in Literature and Literary Theory. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Assessing Writing will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How much does it cost to publish in Assessing Writing?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,330 USD for Assessing Writing. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to Assessing Writing?

Comparable journals include Language Testing in Asia, Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, Studies in Language Assessment, and Gist-Education and Learning Research Journal. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Assessing Writing?

Most Elsevier and Cell Press journals take submissions through Editorial Manager; each journal has its own site, reached from Submit your article on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search