Journal decision profile

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Medicine

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.1, ranking Q1 in Complementary and alternative medicine and 2 other subfields. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Elsevier BVUnited KingdompISSN 1744-3881eISSN 1873-6947
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
3.1

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 4.03.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
122 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 70–184 days

99 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 99% coverage · 2024–2025

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$3,530

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
3.12026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#181 / 3,990LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
20.2%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
1.17MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
122 daysIQR 70–184 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
129 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share20.2%

104 of 514 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share0.4%

2 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI1.17×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#181

of 3,990 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 1.17, so its typical recent paper runs about 17% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

20.2% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

872016
1002017
1622018
1262019
1832020
2002021
1582022
772023
792024
772025

Recent work-type mix

514 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article71.6%
Review23.5%
Paratext3.1%
Erratum1%
Letter0.8%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies53
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies46
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions26
Cancer survivorship and care23
Physical Activity and Health20
Human-Animal Interaction Studies16
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation15
Music Therapy and Health14
Biofield Effects and Biophysics9
Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects9
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-16. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 514 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Complementary and alternative medicineQ1
Clinical PsychologyQ1
Social PsychologyQ1

Is Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice a good journal?

Yes. A Q1 journal by citation data

Yes. By citation data, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Complementary and alternative medicine and 2 other subfields and ranks #1,314 of 6,272 Medicine journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 21%). Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.1. Recent papers took a median of 122 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,530 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
Complementary and alternative medicine
Rank in Medicine
#1,314 of 6,272
Top 21%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
3.1
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Submission to acceptance
122 days
Median, PubMed records
Indicative APC
$3,530
OpenAlex, verify with the journal
Papers published in 2025
77
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the current article processing charge, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website; the OpenAlex figure is indicative.
  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B3
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#1,314
of 6,272 Medicine field journals
#1,297
among Q1 Medicine journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
1,948
H-Index
89
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
338
Subject Areas
Complementary and alternative medicineClinical PsychologySocial Psychology

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's papers in subfields including Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit through Editorial Manager

    Most Elsevier and Cell Press journals take submissions through Editorial Manager; each journal has its own site, reached from Submit your article on the journal homepage.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,530 USD. Check the current fee, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Recent accepted papers took a median of 122 days from submission to acceptance, including revisions (PubMed dates). Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice does not publish an acceptance rate.

Submission system from the publisher's author information, checked 2026-10-27. Individual journals can differ, so follow the link in the journal's own author guidelines.

New on PubMed

What's new in your field?

Type a topic to see the newest PubMed papers from the past week and the big picture of what they found, summarized by Claude on the Pro plan. Get a free weekly email to keep up.

See a demo:GLP-1CRISPRLong COVID

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Is Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is a strong journal: it is Q1 in Complementary and alternative medicine and 2 other subfields and ranks #1,314 of 6,272 Medicine journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 21%). Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.1. Recent papers took a median of 122 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,530 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.1, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. What recent PubMed records do show is speed: accepted papers took a median of 122 days from submission to acceptance. To judge selectivity, compare Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice in?

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Complementary and alternative medicine; Q1 in Clinical Psychology; Q1 in Social Psychology. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice take from submission to acceptance?

Across 99 recent PubMed records with both dates, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice took a median of 122 days from submission to acceptance; the middle half took 70–184 days. This interval includes editorial handling and revisions, so it is not the time to a first decision.

How much does it cost to publish in Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $3,530 USD for Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice?

Comparable journals include Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, and Integrative Medicine Reports. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice?

Most Elsevier and Cell Press journals take submissions through Editorial Manager; each journal has its own site, reached from Submit your article on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter. Accepted papers took a median of 122 days from submission to acceptance in recent PubMed records.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search