Journal decision profile

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Medicine

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 2.2, ranking Q1 in General Health Professions. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

BioMed CentralUnited KingdompISSN 1478-7547eISSN 1478-7547
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
2.2

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 2.92.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
222 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 124–389 days

100 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 100% coverage · 2024–2025

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$2,790

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
2.22026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#330 / 1,529LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
18.3%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
1.07MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
222 daysIQR 124–389 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
86 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share18.3%

63 of 344 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share0.6%

2 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI1.07×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#330

of 1,529 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 1.07, so its typical recent paper runs about 7% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

18.3% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

132016
222017
662018
292019
552020
812021
742022
972023
922024
962025

Recent work-type mix

344 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article84.9%
Review11.3%
Erratum3.2%
Conference abstract0.3%
Editorial0.3%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and research coverage

OpenAlex topics show the research communities this journal serves.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life108
Healthcare Systems and Reforms30
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA18
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer13
Economic and Environmental Valuation6
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions5
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy5
Malaria Research and Control4
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes4
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management3
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-28. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 344 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Economics and EconometricsQ2
FinanceQ2
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthQ2
General Health ProfessionsQ1

Is Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation a good journal?

Yes. A Q1 journal by citation data

Yes. By citation data, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is a strong journal: it is Q1 in General Health Professions and ranks #487 of 1,741 Economics & Finance journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 28%). Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 2.2. Recent papers took a median of 222 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,790 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Finance, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
General Health Professions
Rank in Economics & Finance
#487 of 1,741
Top 28%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
2.2
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Submission to acceptance
222 days
Median, PubMed records
Open access fee (APC)
$2,790
OpenAlex, verify with the journal
Papers published in 2025
96
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the current article processing charge, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website; the OpenAlex figure is indicative.
  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B4
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#487
of 1,741 Economics & Finance field journals
#462
among Q1 Economics & Finance journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
970
H-Index
62
Fully Open Access
Yes
Recent OA Works
970
Subject Areas
Economics and EconometricsFinancePediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthGeneral Health Professions

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's papers in subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Finance, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit online

    Use the submit link in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's author guidelines; BioMed Central runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,790 USD for this open-access journal. Check the current fee, waivers, and any institutional agreement on the journal website.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Recent accepted papers took a median of 222 days from submission to acceptance, including revisions (PubMed dates). Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation does not publish an acceptance rate.

New on PubMed

What's new in your field?

Type a topic to see the newest PubMed papers from the past week and the big picture of what they found, summarized by Claude on the Pro plan. Get a free weekly email to keep up.

See a demo:GLP-1CRISPRLong COVID

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Is Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is a strong journal: it is Q1 in General Health Professions and ranks #487 of 1,741 Economics & Finance journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 28%). Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 2.2. Recent papers took a median of 222 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,790 USD. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Finance, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 2.2, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. What recent PubMed records do show is speed: accepted papers took a median of 222 days from submission to acceptance. To judge selectivity, compare Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation in?

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q2 in Economics and Econometrics; Q2 in Finance; Q2 in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Q1 in General Health Professions. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation take from submission to acceptance?

Across 100 recent PubMed records with both dates, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation took a median of 222 days from submission to acceptance; the middle half took 124–389 days. This interval includes editorial handling and revisions, so it is not the time to a first decision.

How much does it cost to publish in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,790 USD for Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation?

Comparable journals include Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, European Journal of Health Economics, Clinicoeconomics and Outcomes Research, and Value in Health Regional Issues. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation?

Submit online through the link in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation's author guidelines on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter. Accepted papers took a median of 222 days from submission to acceptance in recent PubMed records.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search