Journal decision profile

Reports on Progress in Physics

Physics and Astronomy

Reports on Progress in Physics' 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 9.3, ranking Q1 in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 other subfield. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

IOP PublishingUnited KingdompISSN 0034-4885eISSN 1361-6633
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
9.3

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 18.13.

Review & acceptance time
i
Review & acceptance timeCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
152 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 108–224 days

97 of 100 PubMed-indexed articles · 97% coverage · 2024–2025

Reports on Progress in Physics accepts papers a median of 152 days after submission, including peer review and revisions. That is slower than 72% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
Not available

No journal-level APC is available in the current OpenAlex snapshot. Cost is excluded from scoring.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Reports on Progress in Physics?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
9.32026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#166 / 975LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
56.9%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
3.06MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
152 daysIQR 108–224 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
52 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share56.9%

119 of 209 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share17.7%

37 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI3.06×

Above field-year expectation

Source output rank#166

of 975 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 3.06, so its typical recent paper runs about 206% above its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

56.9% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

1142016
822017
722018
462019
342020
422021
452022
402023
822024
1042025

Recent work-type mix

209 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article98.6%
Erratum1%
Other0.5%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and research coverage

OpenAlex topics show the research communities this journal serves.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies10
2D Materials and Applications9
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research9
Topological Materials and Phenomena8
Quantum Information and Cryptography7
Quantum many-body systems7
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories6
Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications6
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture6
Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates4
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-08-12. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 209 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Nuclear and High Energy PhysicsQ1
Condensed Matter PhysicsQ1

Is Reports on Progress in Physics a good journal?

Yes. One of the most-cited journals in Physics & Astronomy

Yes. By citation data, Reports on Progress in Physics is one of the most-cited journals in Physics & Astronomy: it ranks #36 of 886 Physics & Astronomy journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 5%) and is Q1 in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 other subfield. Reports on Progress in Physics' 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 9.3. Recent papers took a median of 152 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Condensed Matter Physics, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q1
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Rank in Physics & Astronomy
#36 of 886
Top 5%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
9.3
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Submission to acceptance
152 days
Median, PubMed records
Papers published in 2025
104
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q1
Subfield Quartile
B1
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#36
of 886 Physics & Astronomy field journals
#36
among Q1 Physics & Astronomy journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
2,761
H-Index
349
Fully Open Access
No
Recent OA Works
1,505
Subject Areas
Nuclear and High Energy PhysicsCondensed Matter Physics

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Reports on Progress in Physics

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Reports on Progress in Physics' papers in subfields including Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Condensed Matter Physics. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Reports on Progress in Physics homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit online

    Use the submit link in Reports on Progress in Physics' author guidelines; IOP Publishing runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    OpenAlex has no article processing charge on record. Check the journal website for page charges or an optional open-access fee.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Recent accepted papers took a median of 152 days from submission to acceptance, including revisions (PubMed dates). Reports on Progress in Physics does not publish an acceptance rate.

New on PubMed

What's new in your field?

Type a topic to see the newest PubMed papers from the past week and the big picture of what they found, summarized by Claude on the Pro plan. Get a free weekly email to keep up.

See a demo:GLP-1CRISPRLong COVID

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Reports on Progress in Physics

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Reports on Progress in Physics

Is Reports on Progress in Physics a good journal?

Yes. By citation data, Reports on Progress in Physics is one of the most-cited journals in Physics & Astronomy: it ranks #36 of 886 Physics & Astronomy journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 5%) and is Q1 in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 other subfield. Reports on Progress in Physics' 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 9.3. Recent papers took a median of 152 days from submission to acceptance, according to PubMed dates. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Condensed Matter Physics, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Reports on Progress in Physics' Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Reports on Progress in Physics' 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 9.3, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Reports on Progress in Physics?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Reports on Progress in Physics or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. What recent PubMed records do show is speed: accepted papers took a median of 152 days from submission to acceptance. To judge selectivity, compare Reports on Progress in Physics' quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Reports on Progress in Physics in?

Reports on Progress in Physics' best quartile is Q1. By OpenAlex subfield: Q1 in Nuclear and High Energy Physics; Q1 in Condensed Matter Physics. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Reports on Progress in Physics will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does Reports on Progress in Physics take to accept a paper?

Reports on Progress in Physics accepts papers a median of 152 days after submission across 97 recent PubMed records with both dates; the middle half took 108–224 days. This includes peer review, editorial handling, and revisions.

How long is the peer review time at Reports on Progress in Physics?

PubMed records when a manuscript was received and accepted, not the individual review stages, so peer review time on its own is not available. The full time from submission to acceptance at Reports on Progress in Physics, which includes peer review and revisions, has a median of 152 days. For the time to a first decision, check the journal's own website.

Is Reports on Progress in Physics faster than similar journals?

Reports on Progress in Physics' median of 152 days from submission to acceptance is slower than 72% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Which journals are alternatives to Reports on Progress in Physics?

Comparable journals include Reviews of Modern Physics, Nature Reviews Physics, Physical Review Letters, and Nature Physics. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Reports on Progress in Physics?

Submit online through the link in Reports on Progress in Physics' author guidelines on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter. Accepted papers took a median of 152 days from submission to acceptance in recent PubMed records.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search