Giles MF et al., Stroke 2010
In 20 cohorts with 9,808 patients and 456 strokes within 7 days, the pooled area under the curve was 0.72 for both ABCD and ABCD²; most of the variation between studies came from study method and setting (75% of it).
Scores the early stroke risk after a transient ischemic attack from five bedside features.
Result
Answer the five questions to see the score.
Sources
3 studies
3
studies
1,341
citations
535
PubMed papers
Evidence
Known limitations
In 20 cohorts with 9,808 patients and 456 strokes within 7 days, the pooled area under the curve was 0.72 for both ABCD and ABCD²; most of the variation between studies came from study method and setting (75% of it).
In 29 studies of 13,766 patients, a score of 4 or more was 86.7% sensitive but 35.4% specific for stroke within 7 days; 20% of patients scoring below 4 had a carotid stenosis of more than 50% or atrial fibrillation. The authors conclude the score does not reliably separate low- and high-risk patients.
Neurology: Journal Metrics Score 1.1, Q3 · cited 161 times
PubMed · Free full text · DOI
In 4,789 patients with TIA or minor stroke seen quickly by stroke specialists, stroke risk was 1.5% at 2 days and 5.1% at 1 year. Multiple infarcts on imaging, large-artery atherosclerosis and an ABCD² of 6 or 7 each more than doubled the 1-year risk.
N Engl J Med: Journal Metrics Score 29.8, Q1 · cited 619 times
The original paper has been cited 1,341 times, and 535 PubMed articles mention the ABCD² score in their title or abstract. Citation counts from OpenAlex and article counts from PubMed, retrieved November 13, 2026. Journal Metrics Scores and quartiles are from this site’s current release; follow the journal name for details.
After the result
Any suspected TIA · Symptoms still present · Before scoring
Specialist assessment without delay. Treat as acute stroke. Check it was a TIA.
Next steps
Avoid common errors
5 common errors to avoid
and 3 more
When the score misleads
1A low score is not low risk
About 1 in 5 patients scoring below 4 had atrial fibrillation or a carotid stenosis of more than 50%, which need urgent treatment.
2Mimics score points
Over a third of TIA mimics scored 4 or more in a meta-analysis; the score does not decide whether the event was a TIA.
3Blood pressure timing
Use the first blood pressure after the event. Pain and anxiety at that point can raise it.
4Duration is often uncertain
Patients and witnesses may not know how long symptoms lasted; record how the duration was judged.
5Imaging adds to the score
In a 2016 cohort, multiple acute infarcts on imaging and large-artery atherosclerosis each more than doubled the 1-year stroke risk, independently of the score. Scores that add brain and carotid imaging (ABCD²-I, ABCD³-I) discriminate better than ABCD² alone.
Formula
Age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration and diabetes; 0 to 3 low, 4 to 5 moderate, 6 to 7 high.
Age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration and diabetes; 0 to 3 low, 4 to 5 moderate, 6 to 7 high.
Items and score ranges
| Item | Finding | Points |
|---|---|---|
| A: Age | 60 or older | 1 |
| B: Blood pressure | Systolic 140 or more, or diastolic 90 or more | 1 |
| C: Clinical features | Speech disturbance without weaknessUnilateral weakness (with or without speech disturbance) | 12 |
| D: Duration of symptoms | 10 to 59 minutes60 minutes or more | 12 |
| D: Diabetes | Yes | 1 |
| Risk | Score | 2-day stroke | Patients |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low risk | 0 to 3 | 1.0% | 1,628 |
| Moderate risk | 4 to 5 | 4.1% | 2,169 |
| High risk | 6 to 7 | 8.1% | 1,012 |
Johnston 2007
Face-to-face scoring
NICE 2019
Test cases
3 published cases, each also a test case
3 published cases; the calculator reproduces every score.
Worked examples
A 31-year-old woman having a repeat cesarean section under spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl suddenly lost her voice and felt tingling over her face, without weakness. Her blood pressure at the time was 110/64 mmHg, and the aphonia resolved after 20 minutes. The authors scored the ABCD² as 2 and found no embolic source.
“ABCD2 score in this patient was 2 (speech disturbance without weakness [1 point] and duration of symptoms <60minutes [1 point]).”
Speech 1 and duration 10 to 59 minutes 1. The authors discuss intrathecal fentanyl as a possible cause, so this event may have been a mimic rather than a TIA.
Entered as: Age: Under 60 (0); Blood pressure: Below 140/90 mmHg (0); Clinical features: Speech disturbance without weakness (1); Duration of symptoms: 10 to 59 minutes (1); Diabetes: No (0).
Source: Ray BR et al., J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012 (PubMed · Free full text · DOI)
A healthy 45-year-old woman could not speak after waking from general anesthesia for a laparoscopic hysterectomy. The aphasia lasted about an hour, her voice was hoarse after that, and she spoke normally by 4 hours; imaging was normal. The authors scored the ABCD² as 3 and attributed the event to a psychoemotional reaction rather than a TIA.
“The “ABCD2” score in this patient was 3 (speech disturbance without weakness [1 point] and duration of symptoms > 60 minutes [2 points]).”
Speech 1 and duration of 60 minutes or more 2. The report does not give the blood pressure at assessment; the authors did not score it, so it is entered as below 140/90.
Entered as: Age: Under 60 (0); Blood pressure: Below 140/90 mmHg (0); Clinical features: Speech disturbance without weakness (1); Duration of symptoms: 60 minutes or more (2); Diabetes: No (0).
Source: Zhang J et al., Clin Case Rep 2021 (PubMed · Free full text · DOI)
An 82-year-old woman on warfarin for a mechanical mitral valve had episodes of left arm weakness and numbness after hitting her head on a car door. Her blood pressure was 128/68 mmHg and no diabetes was reported. TIA was suspected and the ABCD² was 4, but CT and MRI showed a small subdural hematoma; the episodes were transient deficits from the hematoma.
“ABCD2 score was 4 (age ≥60 years old, 1 point; weakness in one upper limb, 2 points; duration of symptoms, 10-59 minutes: 1 point).”
Age 1, unilateral weakness 2 and duration 1, as the authors scored it (the case text says the first episode resolved within a few minutes). She had treated hypertension, but the item scores the measured blood pressure (128/68 mmHg), not the history. A moderate score does not tell a TIA from a mimic; in a patient on anticoagulation after head trauma, imaging comes first.
Entered as: Age: 60 or older (1); Blood pressure: Below 140/90 mmHg (0); Clinical features: Unilateral weakness (with or without speech disturbance) (2); Duration of symptoms: 10 to 59 minutes (1); Diabetes: No (0).
Source: Takahashi N et al., Intern Med 2025 (PubMed · Free full text · DOI)
FAQ
6 questions and answers
and 4 more answers
Questions
Age (60 or older, 1 point), Blood pressure (140/90 mmHg or higher at first assessment, 1 point), Clinical features (unilateral weakness 2 points, or speech disturbance without weakness 1 point), Duration (60 minutes or more 2 points, 10 to 59 minutes 1 point) and Diabetes (1 point). The two D’s give the squared sign. The total runs from 0 to 7.
Across the cohorts of the 2007 study, a score of 6 or 7 was high risk (8.1% had a stroke within 2 days), 4 or 5 moderate (4.1%), and 0 to 3 low (1.0%). Many services used 4 or more to decide who was seen within 24 hours.
With care. A 2015 meta-analysis found that a score of 4 or more caught 87% of strokes within 7 days but was only 35% specific, and that 1 in 5 patients scoring below 4 had atrial fibrillation or a significant carotid stenosis. UK guidance from NICE (2019) advises against using scores such as ABCD² to assess stroke risk or decide how urgently to refer: every suspected TIA is to be seen by a specialist within 24 hours. US guidance (AHA/ASA 2021) still uses a score of 4 or more, as the CHANCE and POINT trials did, to pick out high-risk TIA for short-term dual antiplatelet treatment. The score is still a quick summary of risk factors, not a reason to delay assessment.
From the first blood pressure taken after the event: a systolic of 140 or more, or a diastolic of 90 or more, scores 1 point.
Then it is not a TIA yet. Treat it as a possible acute stroke and follow the stroke pathway, since reperfusion treatment may be possible.
No. In the 2015 meta-analysis, 35% to 41% of TIA mimics scored 4 or more. Migraine aura, seizures, syncope, low blood sugar and functional symptoms can all score points.
Further reading
7 references with PubMed and DOI links
7
references
4
free full text
From Johnston SC et al., Lancet 2007 to the newest case reports.
References
clinical grade of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, I to V.
total calcium adjusted for albumin, in mg/dL or mmol/L.
stroke severity from 15 bedside items, 0 to 42.
MAP from systolic and diastolic pressure, against the 65 mm Hg target.
eye, verbal and motor scores for preverbal children, 3 to 15.
oxygenation ratio with the Berlin ARDS severity ranges.
serum sodium corrected for high glucose, Katz or Hillier factor.
sodium − (chloride + bicarbonate), with the albumin-corrected gap.
urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio, in US or SI units.
estimated creatinine clearance with actual, ideal or adjusted weight.
cardiac output and index from oxygen consumption and saturations.
ANC from the white cell count, neutrophils and bands.
insulin resistance from fasting glucose and insulin, in US or SI units.
FENa from plasma and urine sodium and creatinine: prerenal, indeterminate or tubular pattern.
three-item stroke severity screen for large vessel occlusion, 0 to 4.
water deficit in hypernatremia from sodium, weight and body water.
expected PaCO2 in metabolic acidosis, 1.5 × HCO3 + 8 ± 2.
corrected QT interval by Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham or Hodges.
head CT decision rule for children with minor head trauma.
blood loss before hemoglobin or hematocrit reaches a chosen lowest value.
eye, verbal and motor response, 3 to 15, with GCS-Pupils.
Devine ideal body weight and adjusted weight from height and sex.
cuffed and uncuffed tube size and oral depth by age.
calculated osmolality, osmolal gap and ethanol correction.
severity of alcohol-associated hepatitis from prothrombin time and bilirubin.
MELD, MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 for chronic liver disease.
Which published the pooled validation analysis, with its current metrics.
Contributed by Dr. Meng Zhao (MD · Former Neurosurgeon · Medical AI Researcher), from the original publications listed here. Last updated November 13, 2026. LinkedIn
The calculator code is tested against every worked example on this page before each release.
This calculator supports, and does not replace, clinical judgment. It is meant for healthcare professionals and is not medical advice for patients. Report an error through the contact page.