2026 Journal Metrics Score
0.0
Updated August 2026 · 2-year citation average from OpenAlex data
The Journal Metrics Score is the two-year mean citedness of a journal, computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works. Quartiles rank journals within each OpenAlex subfield by score. Data source: OpenAlex (CC0).
Bookmark this page — track this journal's Journal Metrics Score, quartile and field rankings with every OpenAlex data release.
| Category | Quartile |
|---|---|
| Literature and Literary Theory | Q4 |
| Education | Q4 |
| History | Q4 |
| Sociology and Political Science | Q4 |
A lower-cited Q4 journal by citation data
By citation data, Chicago Review is in the lowest quartile in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 other subfields and ranks #6,172 of 6,918 Social Sciences journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 90%). A Q4 placement means its papers are cited less than most in the subfield; on its own it does not mean the journal is predatory or that its peer review is weak. Chicago Review's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.0. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Literature and Literary Theory, Education, and History, so check that your topic fits its scope.
Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.
Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.
Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.
Chicago Review's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.0, updated August 2026 from OpenAlex citation data. The journal is ranked Q4 in this Journal Metrics record.
OpenAlex lists these research topics for Chicago Review's papers: Poetry Analysis and Criticism, Educational Leadership and Practices, American Sports and Literature, and Race, History, and American Society.
OpenAlex records 10,106 citations to papers published in Chicago Review, and 117 of its papers have been cited at least 10 times each (i10-index).
Before using this record in a shortlist or submission decision, confirm the title and ISSN against its OpenAlex record. Our methodology explains how the score and quartiles are computed.
Ranked #6,172 in Social Sciences by Journal Metrics Score and #382 among Q4 Social Sciences journals. This context helps compare Chicago Review against journals publishing in the same field.
Published 35 papers across the last 5 recorded years with a current Journal Metrics Score of 0.0.
Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.
OpenAlex classifies Chicago Review's papers in subfields including Literature and Literary Theory, Education, and History. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.
Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.
Use the submit link in Chicago Review's author guidelines; University of Chicago Press runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.
OpenAlex has no article processing charge on record. Check the journal website for page charges or an optional open-access fee.
Chicago Review does not publish an acceptance rate.
Reviewer Two · coming soon
An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.
See what the report coversBy citation data, Chicago Review is in the lowest quartile in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 other subfields and ranks #6,172 of 6,918 Social Sciences journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 90%). A Q4 placement means its papers are cited less than most in the subfield; on its own it does not mean the journal is predatory or that its peer review is weak. Chicago Review's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.0. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Literature and Literary Theory, Education, and History, so check that your topic fits its scope.
We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Chicago Review or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. To judge selectivity, compare Chicago Review's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.
Submit online through the link in Chicago Review's author guidelines. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter.
Papers Chicago Review published each year, and citations its papers received in that year, from OpenAlex.