Journal decision profile

Journal of Classics Teaching

Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences

Journal of Classics Teaching's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.1, ranking Q3 in Anthropology and 1 other subfield. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Cambridge University PressUnited KingdompISSN 1741-7627eISSN 2058-6310
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
0.1

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 0.17.

Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED

Not available — there are not enough recent PubMed records with both received and accepted dates.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
Not available

No journal-level APC is available in the current OpenAlex snapshot. Cost is excluded from scoring.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Journal of Classics Teaching?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
0.12026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#1469 / 8,263LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
4.1%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
0.43MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
—NOT AVAILABLE
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
88 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share4.1%

14 of 344 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share0.6%

2 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI0.43×

Below field-year expectation

Source output rank#1469

of 8,263 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.43, so its typical recent paper runs about 57% below its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

4.1% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

272016
232017
322018
342019
642020
772021
682022
862023
1202024
942025

Recent work-type mix

344 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Book review64.2%
Article32.8%
Editorial2.3%
Erratum0.3%
Other0.3%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and research coverage

OpenAlex topics show the research communities this journal serves.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Classical Antiquity Studies171
Classical Studies and Philology66
Classical Philosophy and Thought12
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy12
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies8
Educational Games and Gamification7
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning6
Artificial Intelligence in Education4
Second Language Acquisition and Learning4
Education during COVID-19 pandemic3
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-25. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 344 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
AnthropologyQ3
Language and LinguisticsQ3

Is Journal of Classics Teaching a good journal?

A mid-ranked Q3 journal by citation data

By citation data, Journal of Classics Teaching is a mid-ranked journal: it is Q3 in Anthropology and 1 other subfield, the third quarter of journals by score, below the subfield median, and ranks #2,271 of 3,508 Arts & Humanities journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 65%). Journal of Classics Teaching's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.1. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Anthropology and Language and Linguistics, so check that your topic fits its scope.

Best quartile
Q3
Anthropology
Rank in Arts & Humanities
#2,271 of 3,508
Top 65%
2026 Journal Metrics Score
0.1
Acceptance rate
Not published
By the journal or publisher
Access model
Fully open access
No APC on record in OpenAlex
Papers published in 2025
89
OpenAlex works

Check before you submit

  • Confirm the journal is indexed where your institution or funder requires (for example Scopus or PubMed) before you submit.

Verdict from citation data only: quartile and field rank by Journal Metrics Score (OpenAlex), publisher-reported acceptance rates, and PubMed submission and acceptance dates. See how we rank journals and how to verify indexing.

Q3
Subfield Quartile
B4
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#2,271
of 3,508 Arts & Humanities field journals
#340
among Q3 Arts & Humanities journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
685
H-Index
9
Fully Open Access
Yes
Recent OA Works
685
Subject Areas
AnthropologyLanguage and Linguistics

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

How to submit to Journal of Classics Teaching

  1. 1

    Check the scope

    OpenAlex classifies Journal of Classics Teaching's papers in subfields including Anthropology and Language and Linguistics. Read the aims and scope page and a few recent papers close to your topic before you prepare the manuscript.

  2. 2

    Follow the author guidelines

    Article types, word and figure limits, reference style, and the required statements (data availability, ethics, conflicts of interest, author contributions) are set by the journal. Prepare the cover letter and files to match them.

    Journal of Classics Teaching homepage ↗
  3. 3

    Submit online

    Use the submit link in Journal of Classics Teaching's author guidelines; Cambridge University Press runs the submission site. Every author usually needs an ORCID iD, and the corresponding author needs an account on the submission site.

  4. 4

    Plan for costs

    The journal is fully open access, and OpenAlex has no article processing charge on record. Check the journal website for current fees and waivers.

  5. 5

    Know what to expect

    Journal of Classics Teaching does not publish an acceptance rate.

Reviewer Two · coming soon

Know what reviewers will say before you submit to Journal of Classics Teaching

An AI pre-submission report on your manuscript: the objections a tough reviewer is likely to raise, desk-rejection risks, and better-fit journals from our data. $29 per report.

See what the report covers

Common questions about Journal of Classics Teaching

Is Journal of Classics Teaching a good journal?

By citation data, Journal of Classics Teaching is a mid-ranked journal: it is Q3 in Anthropology and 1 other subfield, the third quarter of journals by score, below the subfield median, and ranks #2,271 of 3,508 Arts & Humanities journals by Journal Metrics Score (top 65%). Journal of Classics Teaching's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.1. OpenAlex classifies its papers in subfields including Anthropology and Language and Linguistics, so check that your topic fits its scope.

What is Journal of Classics Teaching's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Journal of Classics Teaching's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 0.1, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What is the acceptance rate of Journal of Classics Teaching?

We have not found an official acceptance rate published by Journal of Classics Teaching or its publisher, and Journal Metrics does not estimate one because submission counts are not public. To judge selectivity, compare Journal of Classics Teaching's quartile and score with similar journals, or ask the editorial office.

What quartile is Journal of Classics Teaching in?

Journal of Classics Teaching's best quartile is Q3. By OpenAlex subfield: Q3 in Anthropology; Q3 in Language and Linguistics. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Journal of Classics Teaching will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

Which journals are alternatives to Journal of Classics Teaching?

Comparable journals include Mnemosyne, Classical Quarterly, Hermes-Zeitschrift Fur Klassische Philologie, and Exemplaria Classica. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

How do I submit a paper to Journal of Classics Teaching?

Submit online through the link in Journal of Classics Teaching's author guidelines on the journal homepage. Before submitting, check the scope, follow the author guidelines for article type, length, and required statements, and prepare a cover letter.

Cite an article from this journal
Back to Search