Journal decision profile

Iet Nanobiotechnology

Materials Science

Iet Nanobiotechnology's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.9, ranking Q2 in Materials Chemistry and 3 other subfields. Two-year citation average from OpenAlex data, updated August 2026.

Institution of Engineering and TechnologyUnited StatespISSN 1751-8741eISSN 1751-875X
Checking system sharing availability.Visit homepage

Bookmark this page — track observed submission-to-acceptance timing, FWCI and field-normalized citation data for this journal in one view.

Journal Metrics Score
i
Journal Metrics ScoreThe raw score is citations received in the latest complete year by works from the two previous years, divided by the number of those works. It is calculated from OpenAlex open data (CC0) and is not a percentage grade.
2026
3.9

Journal Metrics Score 2026 · 2021–2024 window citedness 4.89.

Review & acceptance time
i
Review & acceptance timeCalendar days between the received and accepted dates reported in recent PubMed records. This interval includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
PUBMED
154 daysmedian

Middle 50%: 130–247 days

26 of 26 PubMed-indexed articles · 100% coverage · 2024–2025

Iet Nanobiotechnology accepts papers a median of 154 days after submission, including peer review and revisions. That is slower than 84% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

Indicative APC
i
Indicative APCThis journal-level estimate comes from the OpenAlex source record. It is not a verified quote and may exclude taxes, waivers, society discounts, or article-type charges. Check the journal's official website before deciding.
OPENALEX · VERIFY
$2,610

Journal-level estimate only. Verify current charges, taxes, waivers, discounts, and article-type fees with the journal.

Free preview · no sign-in

Does your manuscript fit Iet Nanobiotechnology?

Paste your title to see which of this journal's published topics it overlaps with. Your title stays in your browser for this preview and is not sent anywhere.

Want ranked journals with fit reasons, risks and a submission strategy instead? See a sample AI report.

At a glance

Journal decision profile

Each spoke is a 0–100 percentile within a comparable journal cohort—not a percentage grade or a single black-box rating.

Relative profile

Metrics ScoreThe raw 2026 Journal Metrics Score is the recent two-year citation average shown above. The radar converts it to a 0–100 cohort percentile: farther out means a higher score than more comparable journals. It is not a percentage grade.iSource outputThe raw rank compares lifetime output inside the journal’s leading-topic source set. The radar then compares that rank position across Decision Profile journals in the same primary OpenAlex field; when that field has too few profiles, it uses the broader profile set. Farther out means relatively more output, not better research quality.iTop 10% shareThe share of recent papers in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield. The radar converts that share to a 0–100 cohort percentile; it does not predict how a new paper will perform.iMedian FWCICitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected citation level for comparable papers; the radar shows its 0–100 cohort percentile.iSubmission-to-acceptanceCalendar days from the received date to the accepted date in recent PubMed records. This includes editorial handling and author revisions, so it is not the time to first decision and not pure peer-review time. The radar uses a 0–100 cohort percentile with shorter observed timing plotted farther out; it does not measure review quality.iOutput volumeAverage works published per year in the recent analysis window, converted to a 0–100 cohort percentile. Farther out means the journal publishes more papers; it does not mean those papers are better.i
Cost is intentionally excluded. Missing APC data is never converted to a zero-dollar fee or a fabricated cost score.

Raw values behind the shape

Always visible
Metrics Score
i
Metrics ScoreThe 2026 raw Journal Metrics Score shown above. The bar is its 0–100 percentile within the radar's comparable journal cohort; it is not a percentage score.
3.92026 · OPENALEX
Source output rank
i
Source output rankThis lifetime journal-wide output rank compares works published by the OpenAlex source with sources associated with the journal’s leading topic. More output does not mean higher quality.
#261 / 2,617LIFETIME OUTPUT
Highly cited papers
i
Highly cited papersShare of recent works in the global top 10% for citations after comparing papers of the same type, publication year, and subfield.
7.8%FIELD-NORMALIZED TOP 10%
Field-normalized impact
i
Field-normalized impactCitation performance of the middle recent paper after field, year, and work type are considered. A raw FWCI of 1.0 is the expected level for comparable work.
0.80MEDIAN FWCI
Submission-to-acceptance
i
Submission-to-acceptanceReceived-to-accepted calendar days from qualified PubMed records. It includes editorial handling and author revisions; it is not time to first decision or pure peer-review time.
154 daysIQR 130–247 DAYS
Recent output
i
Recent outputAverage works published per year across the complete analysis window. This is a volume measure, not a quality score.
45 / yr2021–2024 AVG
Field-normalized top 10% share7.8%

14 of 179 works · same type, year & subfield

Field-normalized top 1% share1.1%

2 works · same type, year & subfield

Median FWCI0.80×

Below field-year expectation

Source output rank#261

of 2,617 topic-associated OpenAlex sources by lifetime output

What does Median FWCI mean?

FWCI compares papers with the same publication year, type, and field. 1.0 is the world average; above 1.0 is above expectation. This journal's median is 0.80, so its typical recent paper runs about 20% below its field benchmark.

What does Top 10% Share mean?

7.8% of recent papers rank in the global top 10% after field normalization. This is easier to compare across specialties than raw citation totals.

Publishing pattern

Publication volume and article mix

Volume is separated from citation accumulation so newer papers are not presented as weaker simply because they are newer.

Works published by year

OpenAlex source records · 2016–2025

1472016
1352017
1712018
1322019
1042020
822021
412022
422023
142024
142025

Recent work-type mix

179 OpenAlex works · 2021–2024

Article83.8%
Paratext11.7%
Editorial1.7%
Erratum1.7%
Retraction0.6%
Review0.6%
OpenAlex article is broader than “original research.” PubMed Publication Types can add case-report and clinical-study detail.
Fit signals

Topics and medical subject coverage

OpenAlex topics show research communities; MeSH keeps the medical taxonomy recognizable.

Major MeSH signals

PubMed-indexed works

Select a MeSH signal to see how much Iet Nanobiotechnology publishes on it, from PubMed counts for the last five complete years.

Leading OpenAlex topics

2021–2024 works
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery27
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications25
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems5
Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications5
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics5
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal4
Wound Healing and Treatments4
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques3
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery3
Analytical chemistry methods development3
Methodology: OpenAlex snapshot 2026-10-19. FWCI, percentile badges, topics, and type mix use 179 works published 2021–2024. Radar normalization is versioned in the cached profile, and no cost score is assigned without reliable APC data.

Subject Category Quartiles

Quartiles computed within each OpenAlex subfield
CategoryQuartile
Materials ChemistryQ2
BiomaterialsQ2
Biomedical EngineeringQ2
Molecular BiologyQ2
Q2
Subfield Quartile
B4
CAS Block

Ranking and source check

#392
of 1,169 Materials Science field journals
#25
among Q2 Materials Science journals

Confirm the exact title and ISSNs against the publisher homepage before a high-stakes submission decision.

IET journals compared

2026 Journal Metrics Scores for 13 of 30 IET journals published by Institution of Engineering and Technology, highest score first. Each journal is scored separately; there is no combined score for the IET family.

  1. Iet Quantum Communication4.1Q1
  2. Iet Renewable Power Generation4.1Q1
  3. Iet Nanodielectrics4.0Q2
  4. Iet Smart Grid4.0Q1
  5. Iet Nanobiotechnologythis journal3.9Q2
  6. Iet Smart Cities3.7Q1
  7. Iet Optoelectronics3.3Q2
  8. Iet Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing3.0Q2
  9. Iet Generation Transmission & Distribution3.0Q2
  10. Iet Cyber-Systems and Robotics2.5Q2
  11. Iet Science Measurement & Technology1.8Q2
  12. Iet Circuits Devices & Systems1.3Q3
  13. Iet Systems Biology1.3Q4

Journal Details

OpenAlex Works
1,155
H-Index
68
Fully Open Access
Yes
Recent OA Works
941
Subject Areas
Materials ChemistryBiomaterialsBiomedical EngineeringMolecular Biology

Source: the current OpenAlex source record. OpenAlex works can include multiple work types. Fully Open Access is a source-level flag. Recent OA Works is summed from OpenAlex's counts_by_year series (up to the latest ten years); it is not a lifetime OA percentage. Any APC shown here is an indicative OpenAlex value—verify current charges on the journal's official website.

Common questions about Iet Nanobiotechnology

What is Iet Nanobiotechnology's Journal Metrics Score in 2026?

Iet Nanobiotechnology's 2026 Journal Metrics Score is 3.9, from the August 2026 data release. The score is a two-year citation average computed from OpenAlex (CC0) data: citations received in the most recent complete year to works published in the two prior years, divided by the number of those works.

What quartile is Iet Nanobiotechnology in?

Iet Nanobiotechnology's best quartile is Q2. By OpenAlex subfield: Q2 in Materials Chemistry; Q2 in Biomaterials; Q2 in Biomedical Engineering; Q2 in Molecular Biology. Quartiles rank journals by Journal Metrics Score within each subfield.

Is the Journal Metrics Score the same as other journal citation metrics?

No. Journal Metrics computes the score independently from OpenAlex open data. Other providers use different citation databases, document types, and counting rules, so their published figures for Iet Nanobiotechnology will not match this score exactly. Compare journals using one source at a time.

How long does Iet Nanobiotechnology take to accept a paper?

Iet Nanobiotechnology accepts papers a median of 154 days after submission across 26 recent PubMed records with both dates; the middle half took 130–247 days. This includes peer review, editorial handling, and revisions.

How long is the peer review time at Iet Nanobiotechnology?

PubMed records when a manuscript was received and accepted, not the individual review stages, so peer review time on its own is not available. The full time from submission to acceptance at Iet Nanobiotechnology, which includes peer review and revisions, has a median of 154 days. For the time to a first decision, check the journal's own website.

Is Iet Nanobiotechnology faster than similar journals?

Iet Nanobiotechnology's median of 154 days from submission to acceptance is slower than 84% of comparable journals with PubMed timing data.

How much does it cost to publish in Iet Nanobiotechnology?

OpenAlex lists an indicative article processing charge of $2,610 USD for Iet Nanobiotechnology. This journal-level estimate may exclude taxes, waivers, discounts, or article-type fees, so confirm the current charge on the journal's website.

Which journals are alternatives to Iet Nanobiotechnology?

Comparable journals include Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology, Journal of Liposome Research, Frontiers in Drug Delivery, and Rsc Pharmaceutics. Compare their scores, acceptance times, and costs in the recommended alternatives on this page before choosing where to submit.

Back to Search